Thanks to voters’ enthusiasm and a nice weather across the nation, there was a high turnout rate for the Nov. 24 nine-in-one elections. However, as 10 national referendums were held together with the elections, the voting process was much larger in scale and more complex.
The lowering of the age threshold for referendum voters to 18 also led to an increase in the number of voters. Not only did this make voting time-consuming, it delayed the vote-counting process and the announcement of the results.
Due to the lack of preparation by election authorities and slow response at polling stations, long lines formed at stations across the nation, with many people still waiting to cast their ballots when the vote count started at 4pm.
Many people gave up after having waited for too long, while others intentionally cast invalid votes to vent their anger. Although it has yet to be determined if this affected the results, it did undermine the public’s right to exercise their civic rights.
As poorly organized elections could be a variable in the election outcome, Taiwan must avoid a recurrence of the problem by considering electronic voting, allowing people to exercise their civic rights by voting via the Internet using their citizen digital certificates (CDC) or electronic IDs.
Taiwanese are already used to dealing with financial institutions using various kinds of verification tools, and the Ministry of the Interior’s promotion of the CDC has been effective.
As long as the voting details are thoroughly planned, implementing electronic voting would not only be feasible, but also in line with Taiwan’s image as a leading democratic and technologically advanced nation.
Estonia was the first nation in the world to implement electronic voting during its parliamentary elections in 2007. The US, the UK, France, Germany, Switzerland and other nations have also gradually pushed electronic voting.
In Switzerland, people using the electronic system have to wait for a password sent by the authorities by mail before election day to be able to vote. However, in Estonia, voters use their Estonian ID cards, which are similar to Taiwan’s CDCs, and do not have to wait for a special password sent by mail.
Moreover, nations that offer electronic voting do not require voters residing abroad to return to their home country to be able to vote, and early voting prior to election day is available. Estonia even allows people to change their electronic vote by going to the polling station on election day and vote using a paper ballot.
The greatest advantages of electronic voting is convenience and efficiency, making it easy for people to vote, while reducing the workload of polling station staff.
However, its biggest problem is security. If the system is hacked, questions of vote-rigging or voter fraud would give rise to political disputes and election-related lawsuits.
Moreover, electronic voting is no guarantee of voting confidentiality, and this might encourage vote-buying practices and lead to unfair elections. In light of these problems, the government should push for electronic voting with caution.
Allowing absentee voting has been discussed for years, but it will take a long time to build public trust in a new voting system. Once there is voter trust, the nation can skip constituency voting and implement an electronic voting system, thus resolving the absentee voting issue.
From a legal perspective, the Additional Articles of the Constitution state that Taiwanese residing abroad may return home to exercise their electoral rights in a presidential election. Unless the government amends the Constitution or excludes presidential elections from the application, the implementation of electronic voting in a presidential election could contravene the Constitution.
Furthermore, the implementation of electronic voting would also require an amendment to Article 17 of the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法), which states that “the staff of polling stations may vote at the polling stations at the place of domicile or place of work.”
By further expanding the scope of constituency voting from polling station staff to all eligible voters, voters would no longer be restricted to polling stations based on their household registration. It might be easier to build a consensus behind an amendment to the act than a constitutional amendment.
The biggest concern regarding the implementation of electronic voting is not technology or system design, but political trust. The long-term confrontation between the government and opposition parties implies that it would be difficult for electronic voting to win acceptance unless all parties and voters are convinced that confidentiality can be ensured.
Protecting voting confidentiality to ensure fair elections is essential when pushing for electronic voting, because it involves political trust and is key to whether the system will be adopted.
The government should hold a trial run on a referendum, and then make adjustments based on public feedback. Only after that should the system be gradually expanded to cover elections.
William Yang is a professor at Shih Hsin University’s public policy management department.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under